Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium (CL-W255-PL12SW-A)
Photos 6 |
Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium
240 mm360 mm
Type:liquid cooling
Suitable for:for CPU
Socket Intel:1150, 1155/1156, 1366, 2011/2011 v3, 2066, 1151/1151 v2, 1200
Socket AMD:AM2/AM3/FM1/FM2, AM4
Fan:⌀ 120 mm
Revolutions:up to 1500 rpm
Air or liquid cooling — which is better?Which type of cooling to choose depending on the purpose of the PC
Which CPU cooler to choose?Nuances of choosing a CPU cooler that guarantee safety, durability and quiet operation of the PC
All specifications
Specifications Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium
|
|
Air or liquid cooling — which is better?Which type of cooling to choose depending on the purpose of the PC
Which CPU cooler to choose?Nuances of choosing a CPU cooler that guarantee safety, durability and quiet operation of the PC
Information in model description is for reference purposes.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Thermaltake 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models Thermaltake.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Thermaltake 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models Thermaltake.
Buy Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium
All prices 32 →Система рідинного охолодження Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium Editi | 5 712 ₴ | ||||
Кулер Thermaltake Floe Dx Rgb 240 Tt Premium Edition (CL-W255-PL12SW-A) | 5 889 ₴ | ||||
Кулер Thermaltake Floe Dx Rgb 240 Tt Premium Edition (CL-W255-PL12SW-A) | 5 889 ₴ | ||||
Система водяного охолодження ThermalTake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium Editio | 6 494 ₴ | ||||
ThermalTake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium Edition CL-W255-PL12SW-A | 6 179 ₴ |
20 more offer(s)
Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium configurations
Price for Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 240 TT Premium | from 5 712 ₴ | 32 offers | ||
Thermaltake Floe DX RGB 360 TT Premium | from 9 522 ₴ | 3 offers |
We recommendCompare using chart →