Apacer AH357 64 GB
Videos 1Photos 3 |
Apacer AH357 64Gb | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Information in model description is for reference purposes.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Apacer 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models Apacer.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog Apacer 2024 - new products, best sales and most actual models Apacer.
Buy Apacer AH357 64 GB
All prices 57 →Флеш-накопичувач USB3.1 64GB Apacer AH357 Blue/White (AP64GAH357U-1) AP64G | 186 ₴ | ||||
Apacer 64GB AH357 USB 3.1 (AP64GAH357U-1) Blue | 203 ₴ | ||||
Флеш-драйв APACER 64GB USB 3.1 AH357 Blue/White (AP64GAH357U-1) | 239 ₴ | ||||
Flash Apacer USB 3.1 AH357 64GB Blue AP64GAH357U-1 | 234 ₴ | ||||
USB флеш накопитель Apacer 64GB AH357 Blue USB 3.1 (AP64GAH357U-1) AP64GAH | 341 ₴ |
20 more offer(s)
Video reviews
Disappointed flash drive. The speed of recording a movie with a volume of 1.4 GB is over 6 Mb/s, and the speed of reading is 19 Mb/s. With this, my old flash drive, Kingston, with the same declared parameters, as in Apacer with the same file, gives the following results: recording speed on a flash drive is 15 Mb / s, transmission speed is 27 Mb / s. Otzhe, shkoduyu scho having bought a flash drive. They were cheap, but they weren’t bad at all. Ale mene to the choice succumbed to the introduction of the brand. Now I’m wondering what ye yuulo is not a smut. Nothing worked out. Low speed for writing files to a flash drive. Ice is better for usb 2.0 ..... Олекса: use Apacer AH357 32Gb less than month |
a good flash drive for quiet in whom the caps disappear abnormally no kovpachka - no problems security record Vitaliy Naluvayko: use Apacer AH357 32Gb few months |
Add Review
Apacer AH357 configurations
Price for Apacer AH357 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Apacer AH357 16 GB | from 159 ₴ | 5 offers | ||
Apacer AH357 32 GB | from 152 ₴ | 53 offers | ||
Apacer AH357 64 GB | from 180 ₴ | 58 offers |
We recommendCompare using chart →